Fascinating, because it's counter-intuitive.....Knowing "more" is always supposed to help with future, more complex tasks. But it assumes a linear model of stacking knowledge chunks one on top of the other which, on quick reflection, is so clearly not how the learning brain works.
Fascinating, because it's counter-intuitive.....Knowing "more" is always supposed to help with future, more complex tasks. But it assumes a linear model of stacking knowledge chunks one on top of the other which, on quick reflection, is so clearly not how the learning brain works.
More of this please, Paul Walker.